Skip to content

K
kernel-hardening-checker
Commit 67b39125 by Alexander Popov
Options

Fix style (II)

parent 504d6943
Showing with 81 additions and 81 deletions
kernel_hardening_checker/__init__.py
...@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ from .engine import populate_with_data, perform_checks, override_expected_value ...@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ from .engine import populate_with_data, perform_checks, override_expected_value
def _open(file: str, *args, **kwargs): def _open(file: str, *args, **kwargs):
open_method = open open_method = open
if file.endswith(".gz"): if file.endswith('.gz'):
open_method = gzip.open open_method = gzip.open
return open_method(file, *args, **kwargs) return open_method(file, *args, **kwargs)
......
kernel_hardening_checker/test_engine.py
...@@ -135,16 +135,16 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -135,16 +135,16 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["CONFIG_NAME_2", "kconfig", "expected_2", "decision_2", "reason_2", "FAIL: \"UNexpected_2\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_2', 'kconfig', 'expected_2', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'FAIL: "UNexpected_2"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_3", "kconfig", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: is not found"], ['CONFIG_NAME_3', 'kconfig', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: is not found'],
["CONFIG_NAME_4", "kconfig", "is not set", "decision_4", "reason_4", "OK: is not found"], ['CONFIG_NAME_4', 'kconfig', 'is not set', 'decision_4', 'reason_4', 'OK: is not found'],
["CONFIG_NAME_5", "kconfig", "is present", "decision_5", "reason_5", "OK: is present"], ['CONFIG_NAME_5', 'kconfig', 'is present', 'decision_5', 'reason_5', 'OK: is present'],
["CONFIG_NAME_6", "kconfig", "is present", "decision_6", "reason_6", "FAIL: is not present"], ['CONFIG_NAME_6', 'kconfig', 'is present', 'decision_6', 'reason_6', 'FAIL: is not present'],
["CONFIG_NAME_7", "kconfig", "is not off", "decision_7", "reason_7", "OK: is not off, \"really_not_off\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_7', 'kconfig', 'is not off', 'decision_7', 'reason_7', 'OK: is not off, "really_not_off"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_8", "kconfig", "is not off", "decision_8", "reason_8", "FAIL: is off"], ['CONFIG_NAME_8', 'kconfig', 'is not off', 'decision_8', 'reason_8', 'FAIL: is off'],
["CONFIG_NAME_9", "kconfig", "is not off", "decision_9", "reason_9", "FAIL: is off, \"0\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_9', 'kconfig', 'is not off', 'decision_9', 'reason_9', 'FAIL: is off, "0"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_10", "kconfig", "is not off", "decision_10", "reason_10", "FAIL: is off, not found"]] ['CONFIG_NAME_10', 'kconfig', 'is not off', 'decision_10', 'reason_10', 'FAIL: is off, not found']]
) )
def test_simple_cmdline(self): def test_simple_cmdline(self):
...@@ -178,16 +178,16 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -178,16 +178,16 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["name_1", "cmdline", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['name_1', 'cmdline', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["name_2", "cmdline", "expected_2", "decision_2", "reason_2", "FAIL: \"UNexpected_2\""], ['name_2', 'cmdline', 'expected_2', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'FAIL: "UNexpected_2"'],
["name_3", "cmdline", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: is not found"], ['name_3', 'cmdline', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: is not found'],
["name_4", "cmdline", "is not set", "decision_4", "reason_4", "OK: is not found"], ['name_4', 'cmdline', 'is not set', 'decision_4', 'reason_4', 'OK: is not found'],
["name_5", "cmdline", "is present", "decision_5", "reason_5", "OK: is present"], ['name_5', 'cmdline', 'is present', 'decision_5', 'reason_5', 'OK: is present'],
["name_6", "cmdline", "is present", "decision_6", "reason_6", "FAIL: is not present"], ['name_6', 'cmdline', 'is present', 'decision_6', 'reason_6', 'FAIL: is not present'],
["name_7", "cmdline", "is not off", "decision_7", "reason_7", "OK: is not off, \"\""], ['name_7', 'cmdline', 'is not off', 'decision_7', 'reason_7', 'OK: is not off, ""'],
["name_8", "cmdline", "is not off", "decision_8", "reason_8", "FAIL: is off"], ['name_8', 'cmdline', 'is not off', 'decision_8', 'reason_8', 'FAIL: is off'],
["name_9", "cmdline", "is not off", "decision_9", "reason_9", "FAIL: is off, \"0\""], ['name_9', 'cmdline', 'is not off', 'decision_9', 'reason_9', 'FAIL: is off, "0"'],
["name_10", "cmdline", "is not off", "decision_10", "reason_10", "FAIL: is off, not found"]] ['name_10', 'cmdline', 'is not off', 'decision_10', 'reason_10', 'FAIL: is off, not found']]
) )
def test_simple_sysctl(self): def test_simple_sysctl(self):
...@@ -221,16 +221,16 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -221,16 +221,16 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["name_1", "sysctl", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['name_1', 'sysctl', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["name_2", "sysctl", "expected_2", "decision_2", "reason_2", "FAIL: \"UNexpected_2\""], ['name_2', 'sysctl', 'expected_2', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'FAIL: "UNexpected_2"'],
["name_3", "sysctl", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: is not found"], ['name_3', 'sysctl', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: is not found'],
["name_4", "sysctl", "is not set", "decision_4", "reason_4", "OK: is not found"], ['name_4', 'sysctl', 'is not set', 'decision_4', 'reason_4', 'OK: is not found'],
["name_5", "sysctl", "is present", "decision_5", "reason_5", "OK: is present"], ['name_5', 'sysctl', 'is present', 'decision_5', 'reason_5', 'OK: is present'],
["name_6", "sysctl", "is present", "decision_6", "reason_6", "FAIL: is not present"], ['name_6', 'sysctl', 'is present', 'decision_6', 'reason_6', 'FAIL: is not present'],
["name_7", "sysctl", "is not off", "decision_7", "reason_7", "OK: is not off, \"\""], ['name_7', 'sysctl', 'is not off', 'decision_7', 'reason_7', 'OK: is not off, ""'],
["name_8", "sysctl", "is not off", "decision_8", "reason_8", "FAIL: is off"], ['name_8', 'sysctl', 'is not off', 'decision_8', 'reason_8', 'FAIL: is off'],
["name_9", "sysctl", "is not off", "decision_9", "reason_9", "FAIL: is off, \"0\""], ['name_9', 'sysctl', 'is not off', 'decision_9', 'reason_9', 'FAIL: is off, "0"'],
["name_10", "sysctl", "is not off", "decision_10", "reason_10", "FAIL: is off, not found"]] ['name_10', 'sysctl', 'is not off', 'decision_10', 'reason_10', 'FAIL: is off, not found']]
) )
def test_complex_or(self): def test_complex_or(self):
...@@ -268,12 +268,12 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -268,12 +268,12 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["CONFIG_NAME_3", "kconfig", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "OK: CONFIG_NAME_4 is \"expected_4\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_3', 'kconfig', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'OK: CONFIG_NAME_4 is "expected_4"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_5", "kconfig", "expected_5", "decision_5", "reason_5", "FAIL: \"UNexpected_5\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_5', 'kconfig', 'expected_5', 'decision_5', 'reason_5', 'FAIL: "UNexpected_5"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_7", "kconfig", "expected_7", "decision_7", "reason_7", "OK: CONFIG_NAME_8 is not found"], ['CONFIG_NAME_7', 'kconfig', 'expected_7', 'decision_7', 'reason_7', 'OK: CONFIG_NAME_8 is not found'],
["CONFIG_NAME_9", "kconfig", "expected_9", "decision_9", "reason_9", "OK: CONFIG_NAME_10 is present"], ['CONFIG_NAME_9', 'kconfig', 'expected_9', 'decision_9', 'reason_9', 'OK: CONFIG_NAME_10 is present'],
["CONFIG_NAME_11", "kconfig", "expected_11", "decision_11", "reason_11", "OK: CONFIG_NAME_12 is not off"]] ['CONFIG_NAME_11', 'kconfig', 'expected_11', 'decision_11', 'reason_11', 'OK: CONFIG_NAME_12 is not off']]
) )
def test_complex_and(self): def test_complex_and(self):
...@@ -313,12 +313,12 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -313,12 +313,12 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["CONFIG_NAME_3", "kconfig", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_4 is not \"expected_4\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_3', 'kconfig', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_4 is not "expected_4"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_5", "kconfig", "expected_5", "decision_5", "reason_5", "FAIL: \"UNexpected_5\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_5', 'kconfig', 'expected_5', 'decision_5', 'reason_5', 'FAIL: "UNexpected_5"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_7", "kconfig", "expected_7", "decision_7", "reason_7", "FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_8 is not present"], ['CONFIG_NAME_7', 'kconfig', 'expected_7', 'decision_7', 'reason_7', 'FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_8 is not present'],
["CONFIG_NAME_9", "kconfig", "expected_9", "decision_9", "reason_9", "FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_10 is off"], ['CONFIG_NAME_9', 'kconfig', 'expected_9', 'decision_9', 'reason_9', 'FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_10 is off'],
["CONFIG_NAME_11", "kconfig", "expected_11", "decision_11", "reason_11", "FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_12 is off, not found"]] ['CONFIG_NAME_11', 'kconfig', 'expected_11', 'decision_11', 'reason_11', 'FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_12 is off, not found']]
) )
def test_complex_nested(self): def test_complex_nested(self):
...@@ -360,10 +360,10 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -360,10 +360,10 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["CONFIG_NAME_4", "kconfig", "expected_4", "decision_4", "reason_4", "FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_5 is not \"expected_5\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_4', 'kconfig', 'expected_4', 'decision_4', 'reason_4', 'FAIL: CONFIG_NAME_5 is not "expected_5"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_7", "kconfig", "expected_7", "decision_7", "reason_7", "OK: CONFIG_NAME_8 is \"expected_8\""], ['CONFIG_NAME_7', 'kconfig', 'expected_7', 'decision_7', 'reason_7', 'OK: CONFIG_NAME_8 is "expected_8"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_10", "kconfig", "expected_10", "decision_10", "reason_10", "FAIL: \"UNexpected_10\""]] ['CONFIG_NAME_10', 'kconfig', 'expected_10', 'decision_10', 'reason_10', 'FAIL: "UNexpected_10"']]
) )
def test_version(self): def test_version(self):
...@@ -394,10 +394,10 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -394,10 +394,10 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK: version >= 41.101"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK: version >= 41.101'],
["CONFIG_NAME_2", "kconfig", "expected_2", "decision_2", "reason_2", "FAIL: version < 44.1"], ['CONFIG_NAME_2', 'kconfig', 'expected_2', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'FAIL: version < 44.1'],
["CONFIG_NAME_3", "kconfig", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: version < 42.44"], ['CONFIG_NAME_3', 'kconfig', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: version < 42.44'],
["CONFIG_NAME_4", "kconfig", "expected_4", "decision_4", "reason_4", "OK: version >= 42.43"]] ['CONFIG_NAME_4', 'kconfig', 'expected_4', 'decision_4', 'reason_4', 'OK: version >= 42.43']]
) )
def test_stdout(self): def test_stdout(self):
...@@ -431,8 +431,8 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -431,8 +431,8 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, json_result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, json_result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
json_result, json_result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK: name_2 is \"expected_2\""], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK: name_2 is "expected_2"'],
["CONFIG_NAME_4", "kconfig", "expected_4", "decision_4", "reason_4", "FAIL: name_5 is not \"expected_5\""]] ['CONFIG_NAME_4', 'kconfig', 'expected_4', 'decision_4', 'reason_4', 'FAIL: name_5 is not "expected_5"']]
) )
stdout_result = [] stdout_result = []
...@@ -440,10 +440,10 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase): ...@@ -440,10 +440,10 @@ class TestEngine(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
stdout_result, stdout_result,
[ [
"\ '\
CONFIG_NAME_1 |kconfig| expected_1 |decision_1| reason_1 | \x1b[32mOK: name_2 is \"expected_2\"\x1b[0m\ CONFIG_NAME_1 |kconfig| expected_1 |decision_1| reason_1 | \x1b[32mOK: name_2 is "expected_2"\x1b[0m\
CONFIG_NAME_4 |kconfig| expected_4 |decision_4| reason_4 | \x1b[31mFAIL: name_5 is not \"expected_5\"\x1b[0m\ CONFIG_NAME_4 |kconfig| expected_4 |decision_4| reason_4 | \x1b[31mFAIL: name_5 is not "expected_5"\x1b[0m\
" ] ' ]
) )
stdout_result = [] stdout_result = []
...@@ -451,18 +451,18 @@ CONFIG_NAME_4 |kconfig| expected_4 |decision_4| re ...@@ -451,18 +451,18 @@ CONFIG_NAME_4 |kconfig| expected_4 |decision_4| re
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
stdout_result, stdout_result,
[ [
"\ '\
<<< OR >>> | \x1b[32mOK: name_2 is \"expected_2\"\x1b[0m\n\ <<< OR >>> | \x1b[32mOK: name_2 is "expected_2"\x1b[0m\n\
CONFIG_NAME_1 |kconfig| expected_1 |decision_1| reason_1 | \x1b[31mFAIL: \"UNexpected_1\"\x1b[0m\n\ CONFIG_NAME_1 |kconfig| expected_1 |decision_1| reason_1 | \x1b[31mFAIL: "UNexpected_1"\x1b[0m\n\
name_2 |cmdline| expected_2 |decision_2| reason_2 | \x1b[32mOK\x1b[0m\n\ name_2 |cmdline| expected_2 |decision_2| reason_2 | \x1b[32mOK\x1b[0m\n\
name_3 |sysctl | expected_3 |decision_3| reason_3 | None\ name_3 |sysctl | expected_3 |decision_3| reason_3 | None\
"\ '\
"\ '\
<<< AND >>> | \x1b[31mFAIL: name_5 is not \"expected_5\"\x1b[0m\n\ <<< AND >>> | \x1b[31mFAIL: name_5 is not "expected_5"\x1b[0m\n\
CONFIG_NAME_4 |kconfig| expected_4 |decision_4| reason_4 | None\n\ CONFIG_NAME_4 |kconfig| expected_4 |decision_4| reason_4 | None\n\
name_5 |cmdline| expected_5 |decision_5| reason_5 | \x1b[31mFAIL: \"UNexpected_5\"\x1b[0m\n\ name_5 |cmdline| expected_5 |decision_5| reason_5 | \x1b[31mFAIL: "UNexpected_5"\x1b[0m\n\
name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| reason_6 | \x1b[32mOK\x1b[0m\ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| reason_6 | \x1b[32mOK\x1b[0m\
" ] ' ]
) )
def test_value_overriding(self): def test_value_overriding(self):
...@@ -492,13 +492,13 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re ...@@ -492,13 +492,13 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1", "decision_1", "reason_1", "FAIL: \"expected_1_new\""], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'FAIL: "expected_1_new"'],
["name_2", "cmdline", "expected_2", "decision_2", "reason_2", "FAIL: \"expected_2_new\""], ['name_2', 'cmdline', 'expected_2', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'FAIL: "expected_2_new"'],
["name_3", "sysctl", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: \"expected_3_new\""]] ['name_3', 'sysctl', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: "expected_3_new"']]
) )
# 7. override expected value and perform the checks again # 7. override expected value and perform the checks again
override_expected_value(config_checklist, "CONFIG_NAME_1", "expected_1_new") override_expected_value(config_checklist, 'CONFIG_NAME_1', 'expected_1_new')
perform_checks(config_checklist) perform_checks(config_checklist)
# 8. check that the results are correct # 8. check that the results are correct
...@@ -506,13 +506,13 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re ...@@ -506,13 +506,13 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1_new", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1_new', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["name_2", "cmdline", "expected_2", "decision_2", "reason_2", "FAIL: \"expected_2_new\""], ['name_2', 'cmdline', 'expected_2', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'FAIL: "expected_2_new"'],
["name_3", "sysctl", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: \"expected_3_new\""]] ['name_3', 'sysctl', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: "expected_3_new"']]
) )
# 9. override expected value and perform the checks again # 9. override expected value and perform the checks again
override_expected_value(config_checklist, "name_2", "expected_2_new") override_expected_value(config_checklist, 'name_2', 'expected_2_new')
perform_checks(config_checklist) perform_checks(config_checklist)
# 10. check that the results are correct # 10. check that the results are correct
...@@ -520,13 +520,13 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re ...@@ -520,13 +520,13 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1_new", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1_new', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["name_2", "cmdline", "expected_2_new", "decision_2", "reason_2", "OK"], ['name_2', 'cmdline', 'expected_2_new', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'OK'],
["name_3", "sysctl", "expected_3", "decision_3", "reason_3", "FAIL: \"expected_3_new\""]] ['name_3', 'sysctl', 'expected_3', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'FAIL: "expected_3_new"']]
) )
# 11. override expected value and perform the checks again # 11. override expected value and perform the checks again
override_expected_value(config_checklist, "name_3", "expected_3_new") override_expected_value(config_checklist, 'name_3', 'expected_3_new')
perform_checks(config_checklist) perform_checks(config_checklist)
# 12. check that the results are correct # 12. check that the results are correct
...@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re ...@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ name_6 |sysctl | expected_6 |decision_6| re
self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json') self.get_engine_result(config_checklist, result, 'json')
self.assertEqual( self.assertEqual(
result, result,
[["CONFIG_NAME_1", "kconfig", "expected_1_new", "decision_1", "reason_1", "OK"], [['CONFIG_NAME_1', 'kconfig', 'expected_1_new', 'decision_1', 'reason_1', 'OK'],
["name_2", "cmdline", "expected_2_new", "decision_2", "reason_2", "OK"], ['name_2', 'cmdline', 'expected_2_new', 'decision_2', 'reason_2', 'OK'],
["name_3", "sysctl", "expected_3_new", "decision_3", "reason_3", "OK"]] ['name_3', 'sysctl', 'expected_3_new', 'decision_3', 'reason_3', 'OK']]
) )
setup.py
...@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ ...@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
from setuptools import setup from setuptools import setup
about = {} about = {}
with open("kernel_hardening_checker/__about__.py") as f: with open('kernel_hardening_checker/__about__.py') as f:
exec(f.read(), about) exec(f.read(), about)
print('v: "{}"'.format(about['__version__'])) print('v: "{}"'.format(about['__version__']))
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment